Suspension
Carries the conductors on a stretch with little change of direction. Typically hanging insulator strings.
Pre-launch. ftCEE is just getting started — the site and publications are being built, and the first analyses are coming soon. You’re welcome to get in touch now.Pre-launch — site in progress, first analyses coming soon.
A visual guide to the energy backbone of factories, data centres and large investments. See where power flows, what limits capacity, and what actually confirms that a connection is possible.
A site has energy value when there is a feasible path to deliver power, reliability and timing.
What is nearby?
Where can you connect?
How much can you actually draw?
When will the infrastructure be ready?
Read in order or jump to the tools. All numerical scenarios and drawings are educational examples. The guide supports screening and conversations with the designer and the operator; it is not an electrical design.
A higher voltage carries the same power with a lower current. Successive substations step the voltage down and distribute the energy. Not every customer passes through every level. [1]
PSE. Connects the nodes of the national system. For a plant it matters as the source feeding the regional network or, in specific projects, as the level of direct connection.
Usually a DSO network. An important option for large plants: a 110 kV connection and the plant’s own 110/MV substation.
Often 15 or 20 kV; 6, 10 and 30 kV also occur. From the GPZ to the local network and customer substations. It can supply industry if the local configuration allows.
400 V between phases, 230 V between phase and neutral. A large plant has many local circuits; some machines may run directly on MV.
Connection groups are assigned to the connection, not inferred from how a tower looks. Group VI covers certain temporary connections. [2] Note on Polish abbreviations: NN = extra-high voltage, nN = low voltage.
Recognising the structure helps you read how the network runs. It does not prove the voltage, ownership or spare capacity. Below are illustrations of typical functions — not to scale and without the features of any specific tower series.
Carries the conductors on a stretch with little change of direction. Typically hanging insulator strings.
Takes the conductor tension and separates tension sections. The insulators usually run along the conductor.
Used where the route changes direction. Often also a strain structure.
Ends an overhead section, e.g. at a substation. Must take the conductor forces from one side.
Transition from overhead line to cable: terminations and cable descent. It is not a transformer.
Adapted to particular crossings: rivers, valleys or forest. Dimensions follow from the design.
Conductors on towers. Common in 110/220/400 kV networks and also at MV. The route is visible but needs space, agreements and operational access.
Conductors below ground, in ducts or tunnels. Common at LV and MV; also used at 110 kV. Takes less space above ground but still needs a corridor, land rights and access for repairs.
Observe only from publicly accessible places. Identification never requires approaching equipment or entering a substation.
The role of suspension and strain towers, substations and route planning: PSE — Q&A [3]. Drawings: our own educational schematics.
The connection point is the designated place where your installation joins the network. It can be many kilometres from the nearest line. Its location and requirements are set by the operator.
Carries energy between facilities. It has a defined current rating, parameters and operating arrangement.
Distributes energy, switches circuits and protects the network; with transformers, it also changes the voltage.
A specific place resulting from the analysis and the connection conditions. It is not chosen by distance alone.
Read from the left: input → distribution → transformation → outputs. A functional drawing, not a construction diagram. On a small screen, scroll the diagram sideways.
A bay is the set of equipment serving e.g. one line or one transformer. A “free bay” does not automatically mean free capacity.
Busbars are the common electrical node of the switchgear. How they are split and protected affects the consequences of a fault.
Transformer steps the voltage down. Its MVA rating is only one of the limits of the whole system.
Power describes the rate of consumption at a given moment. Energy is consumption accumulated over time. MVA describes apparent power, which matters for loading transformers and conductors.
Model: a year of 8,760 h, balanced three-phase system, sinusoidal waveforms, no losses. The average/peak ratio is the load factor — not simply the number of operating hours.
Common linear scale, phase current. This is a physical comparison — not an assessment of a line’s permissible loading.
The parameter the connection is designed for, set in the connection documents.
The parameter set in the supply and billing agreement. It is not automatically equal to current consumption.
The part of the load you must keep during a fault. For a 20 MW plant it might be, e.g., 8 MW — that is a process decision.
Set 20 MW and an average demand of 60%. Does annual energy fall to 105.12 GWh? Does the peak current fall too?
Energy falls to 105.12 GWh, because on average you draw 12 MW. The peak current does not change: peak demand is still 20 MW. Lower annual consumption does not remove the need to deliver full power at peak.
N−1 asks whether, after losing one element, the required load can still be served. The number of cables or transformers alone is not enough. What matters is their capacity, shared elements and how they switch over.
In this state the model covers the demand.
The remaining elements have sufficient capability in the model.
Normal state. Two transformers add capability but do not prove resilience to every fault. This tests the selected event; it is not a certificate that the whole system complies with N−1.
Choose “Two paths, shared source” and a source fault. Then separate the sources. Finally set 30 MW and switch off transformer T1.
A shared source can take out both paths. Separating the sources removes that particular common point. After losing one transformer, 23.75 MW remains: enough for 20 MW, but 30 MW falls 6.25 MW short. The “customer’s shared busbar fault” test shows a risk that separating the sources does not remove.
At cos φ 0.95, 50 MVA corresponds to 47.5 MW in this simplification.
After losing one transformer, 23.75 MW of transformation capability remains.
If other customers need 12 MW, 11.75 MW remains arithmetically.
Lines, voltages, short-circuit levels and other commitments may restrict this further.
11.75 MW is the result of an illustrative model, not a confirmation of connection capacity.
The arrangements below show the idea. In practice the operator sets the connection point, the requirements and the scope of work; ownership of each element follows from the agreement. On a small screen you can scroll the diagram sideways.
An HV connection, a 110/MV substation, MV distribution and local MV/LV substations. The ownership boundary and the split between investor and DSO are set by the agreement.
Point of connection and bays, line arrangement, transformation reserve, route rights, automation, metering and operating costs.
May require rebuilding the line arrangement, e.g. bringing it into a substation. It is not an arbitrary “tap from the nearest tower”.
May require a bay, space for switchgear, equipment and a new route to the customer. Free land next to the substation is not enough.
The constraint may lie further away: on the 110 kV line, the 400/110 kV transformation or another supply element.
Brief: the plant draws up to 20 MW, target start Q1 2030, and must keep 20 MW after a specified single-element fault. Compare three locations. All names, distances and dates are illustrative.
Situational diagram, not to scale and without geographic reference; on a small screen scroll it sideways. Solid line = existing infrastructure; dashed = hypothetical route or planned investment.
A 110 kV line runs 100 m from the site. We do not know the designated point, the capacity reserve or the date. A line at the boundary may restrict building, and the connection may require a much longer route.
| Parameter | Site A | Site B | Site C |
|---|---|---|---|
| Nearest 110 kV | 0.1 km | 1.4 km | 4.0 km |
| Actual path | Unconfirmed | 3.2 km from the substation in the WP | Depends on the new substation |
| Document | Map | WP: 20 MW; no signed agreement | Development plan |
| Timing | None | 2030 in the draft agreement, with dependencies | 2032 in the plan; misses the 2030 target |
| Conclusion | Check the point and capacity | Proceed to reviewing the conditions and agreement | Do not base a 2030 start on this investment |
Which location do you take forward for further analysis? Can you already write “20 MW guaranteed in 2030”?
B has the strongest starting point, because a technical path and capacity have been identified. You still need to check the scope of the WP, its validity, the conditions for keeping 20 MW during a fault, the agreement, the schedule and the dependencies. A may turn out better after analysis; for now the evidence is missing. C does not support the assumed date.
These are grounds for analysis, not proof of power delivery.
This ladder is a project tool, not an official classification. Choose a level and see what conclusion it supports and what it does not yet confirm.
A specific line or substation has been identified nearby.
Neither available capacity nor a connection point has been confirmed.
Next evidence: Topology: how lines, substations and operators connect.
Confirms that a facility exists or is planned, within the scope and currency of the map. It does not reserve capacity.
Describe the technical path and requirements. Read the whole document, including conditions, dates and validity.
Sets out the parties’ obligations. Check the schedule, dependencies, scope of work, payments and the consequences of delays.
The operator’s infrastructure and the customer’s installation must be ready at the same time. The date the conditions are issued is not the connection date. The design process has no single universal length.
Capacity, profile, date, reliability, location and alternative sites.
Output: scope of needsThe DSO’s current form, technical annexes, land documents, the application fee and the advance payment — according to the procedure.
Output: complete applicationAssessment of the load’s impact on the network, the point and voltage, and the work needed on both sides. Refusal or a different option is possible.
Output: technical responseScope, responsibility, dates, settlements and dependencies. Confirmation of the required security.
Output: obligations of the partiesRoute, property rights, decisions, consents, substation and equipment design. Some activities can run in parallel.
Risk: route and formalitiesLines, bays, transformers, the customer substation, internal installation. Dependencies on network reinforcement and equipment availability.
Risk: delivery lead timesProtection, metering, control, agreed tests and required acceptances. Verification of operational readiness.
Output: ready for energisationA distribution/transmission agreement and a sales agreement, or an appropriate combined agreement, settlements, and the energisation procedure.
Output: facility energisedProcess skeleton and document examples based on TAURON’s connection procedure for production and service facilities [4]; extended with the project dependencies of a large investment.
According to current TAURON information, conditions issued from that date are in principle valid for one year from delivery. Signing the agreement within that time extends validity for the term of the agreement. There are exceptions; older cases require checking the transitional provisions. [5]
PV can reduce annual consumption from the grid, but without the right configuration it does not provide supply after a grid outage. BESS has separate power (MW) and capacity (MWh): 20 MWh of storage for a 20 MW load gives, in theory, one hour before reserves and losses. Generators must be matched to the load and their operating mode agreed. A PPA is a commercial arrangement and does not by itself increase connection capacity.
Two 20 MW projects can need a completely different scope of work. What counts: substations, the length and difficulty of the route, network reinforcement, land rights and the ownership split.
For standard MV/HV customers, TAURON’s 2026 tariff sets the rule of ¼ of the actual connection expenditure. Check exceptions and special regimes in the tariff and the agreement. [6]
Customer substation, switchgear, internal installation, protection and continuity systems. Their budget is not calculated by automatically applying 25%.
Designs, land rights, consents, financing, a contingency for changes. The cost of delayed production may matter more than the length of the cable.
New application from a standard MV/HV customer, one 20,000 kW connection; current TAURON information. The amounts do not cover the whole investment budget. [7]
| Item | Rule | For 20 MW | Meaning |
|---|---|---|---|
| Application fee | PLN 1/kW, max. PLN 100k | PLN 20,000 | Before submitting the application. |
| Advance payment | PLN 60/kW, max. PLN 6 million | PLN 1,200,000 gross | Credited towards the connection fee; under the procedure, within 14 days of the application. |
| Agreement security | For this example: PLN 30/kW | PLN 600,000 | Under the procedure, within 14 days of signing the agreement; various forms available. |
Do not add the advance payment a second time to the full connection fee. The security need not be a final cost: its form and release affect capital requirements. Cases started before 30.04.2026 follow transitional rules — check the operator’s current notice. [8]
“Does the date refer to building the connection, energising it, or the availability of the full 20 MW? Which investments are preconditions? Which milestones are commitments and which are assumptions?”
Do not assume a standard number of years without a delivery path specific to this location.
Fill in a few fields, tick the evidence you hold and download a note for further analysis. Brief completeness measures how well the information is prepared; it does not assess available capacity.
Do not declare MW, voltage or a date.
Tick only documented items. A high checklist score does not replace conditions or an agreement.
Data is stored only in this browser. Nothing is sent. Download the brief to keep a copy.
Distribution / transmission system operator (DSO / TSO). The DSO runs the distribution network; in Poland the TSO is PSE.
GPZ: main supply point, usually a 110/MV substation. SE: electrical substation — a broader term covering substations with various functions.
Connection conditions (warunki przyłączenia). They set the technical requirements and the scope needed to connect a given facility.
Point of energy consumption — the identifier of the point used for metering and billing. Do not automatically equate it with the ownership boundary.
MW is active power. MWh and GWh are energy. 1 GWh = 1,000 MWh; 1 MW drawn for one hour gives 1 MWh.
MVA is apparent power. In a sinusoidal model P = S × cos φ. For distorting loads, distinguish cos φ from the total power factor.
Circuit: the three-phase circuit of a line. Bay: the equipment serving a given element. Busbars: the common node of the switchgear.
N−1 examines the effects of losing one element within a defined scope. The failure of a shared structure, switchgear or route can take out several seemingly separate paths.
System elements on the supply side of your point, e.g. the 110 kV line and the 400/110 kV transformation. Their limits can block a project.
Energisation means applying voltage. It does not always mean you can immediately draw the full target capacity, that process testing is complete, or that all reserves are in place.
The current rating is the permissible loading of an element under defined conditions. The capacity available to a new customer follows from an analysis of the whole system and its commitments.
An easement governs the utility’s use of a property. The technology corridor relates to operation and the restrictions around a line; its extent is set for each specific investment.
Based on the material provided; layout, diagrams, calculations and scenarios prepared for learning. The official sources below were checked on 26.09.2026. Financial and procedural rules are shown mainly using TAURON as the example; for a specific project, use the documents of the relevant operator. Sources are in Polish.
The role of transmission and distribution voltages and transformation.
Journal of Laws 2025 item 919, regulation of 22.03.2023; connection groups and system operating conditions. Also check the amendments listed on the act’s page.
Substations, towers, routes, easements and the investment process.
Process stages and documents for MV and HV connections.
WP validity from 30.04.2026, exceptions and the link to the agreement.
Connection fees; point 4.3 — standard group II/III customers, with exceptions.
Application fee, advance payment and security for obligations.
Process changes and transitional provisions after the amendment of the Energy Law.
A starting point for identifying infrastructure. The map does not confirm capacity for a site.
Current documents to check when preparing an application.